LECTURERS yesterday wrote to First Minister Jack McConnell asking him to intervene to stop Glasgow University pulling out of a satellite campus set up to help regenerate the south of the country.
Last month, the university said its involvement in the Crichton Campus in Dumfries was under threat because it was running at a loss of £800,000 a year.
The university's plans for a "phased withdrawal" were blamed on the Scottish Funding Council's (SFC) refusal to a request in November last year to increase the number of funded places at the campus from 88 to 300.
However, the SFC, which distributes higher education money on behalf of the Scottish Executive, said the university could continue provision at the campus, set up seven years ago with Paisley University, Bell College and Dumfries and Galloway College, if it saw it as "sufficiently strategically important". Total funding to Glasgow in 2006-07 was almost £147m. With a formal decision to withdraw from Crichton expected at the university's court meeting on Wednesday, UCU Scotland, the lecturers' union, urged Mr McConnell to intervene.
The union also asked the university court to postpone a decision until after the next spending review, which it said may lead to an increase in funding for higher education. A delay would also allow time for a debate in the Scottish Parliament on the issue, scheduled for Thursday.
Alastair Hunter, president of UCU Scotland, added: "Court must give the unions, the students and all those concerned with the local economy and the best interests of Dumfries and Galloway enough time to campaign for the necessary additional public funding."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article