Croydon has been described as "the whole of Britain in a single town" - a fitting description for a borough bidding for city status in 2002.
If Croydon is to be England's winner in the Queen's golden jubilee year, then it has to prove to the Lord Chancellor its prowess in three broad topics; regional significance, historical features including royal connections, and a forward-looking attitude.
Cynics may shrug their shoulders and say So what?' because city status does not directly bring any new powers, but experts say there are real economic gains.
Sunderland, which became a city in 1992, reports the creation of 10,000 new jobs as a direct result.
And judging by the opinion of residents in recent months, most of the public are giving their full support to the campaign - Croydon's third bid in recent years to gain city status.
Croydon Council officially made their submission to the Lord Chancellor's department in October and the drive is led by former mayor, Councillor Mary Walker.
She said: "People who just see lots of tall office blocks think it's a concrete jungle, but that's denying the history of Croydon.
"We have to look forward but recognise the past."
Councillor Walker said the excellent transport links and the quality of life were notable attractions for staff and business chiefs.
The amount of construction in Croydon town centre reflects the urgency with which the town is planning ahead to an exciting future, with several large-scale developments in the pipeline.
Community workers and voluntary organisations have made pledges as part of Croydon's campaign, saying what the town means to them.
And there can be few figures who can command as many community contacts as the former mayor, Councillor Walker.
She added: "I hope that I can bring my experience to the campaign. I hope I know enough people who can help, especially those from ethnic minorities.
"That could be one aspect we didn't touch on enough in our last bid."
It is hoped that Croydon's existing status as a London borough will not hamper its chances - after all, there are two cities within the capital already: Westminster and the City of London.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article