The conviction of Brian Field for the murder of Roy Tutill brings to a close one of the longest-running manhunts this country has seen.
Field, 65, showed no signs of emotion as an Old Bailey judge sentenced him to life behind bars on November 15 for the killing which has baffled police for 33 years.
It ends an unsolved case which has cost millions of pounds and has involved thousands of witnesses and police officers.
Field, a father-of-two, had originally denied the murder only changing his plea in the face of incontrovertible DNA evidence.
For decades he led a double life, apparently a ladies' man, but secretly kidnapping and abusing boys. His 14-year-old victim may now rest in peace, but for Field his jailing means new inquiries.
Hundreds of unsolved cases around the country are to be reopened by police who suspect that Field committed more crimes.
On the afternoon of his disappearance in April 1968, Roy had been hitchhiking home, a common occurrence in the late 1960s, when he was picked up by Field in his Mini.
Field drove him to a lay-by between Chessington and Leatherhead and it was here he molested and strangled the 14-year-old with a piece of rope, putting his lifeless body in the boot.
Field then drove home to his wife and new-born son but didn't dump Roy's body until the next day. Three days later his corpse was found in woodland near Leatherhead.
In the time between the murder and his arrest a year ago, Field has clocked up a string of convictions for other sex-related crimes.
In mitigation at the Old Bailey last month, Field's barrister said his client had suffered years of abuse during his childhood.
Adrian Fulford QC said: "He has experienced a lifetime of living with a terrible, corrosive and all-consuming secret.
"He expected at some stage he would be arrested and evidence produced, and he has lived with that for some 30 years."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article