SOUTH LONDON STORM 16 WEST LONDON SHARKS 41
South London's Rugby League Conference campaign ended as it started, with a defeat, but they can take heart from their spirited performance against West London Sharks. The 16-41 loss was a vast improvement on the 94 point defeat against the same opponents only six week ago.
Storm started the more confidently, and were unlucky not to take the lead through Brendan Bruce, but the winger was bundled into touch just short of the line. Stand off Rob Hewiit also went close before Terry Reader finally gave the South Londoners the lead with a penalty in the 10th minutes.
Sharks reponded with a two try burst, but Storm fought their way back with a deserved try. Barnstorming runs from second rowers Jon Perkins and Marc Taylor took Storm to the visitors' line, and from the resulting play the ball centre Victor Nwabueze crashed over for a try converted by Reader.
Reader then reduced the deficit to two points when he coolly slotted over a penalty from the touchline. Storm had the opportunities to regain the lead when first Gavin Calloo and then Christian Loveday crossed the whitewash, but both we held up by the scrambling Sharks' defence.
Then, just two minutes from the interval a quick Sharks' break saw them cross under the sticks to leave Storm eight points adrift.
The Thornton Heath team battled bravely in the second half, but try as they might they might they could make no headway into the visitors lead.
The pack, led by Perkins, Taylor and Andy Brown worked hard to set up an attacking platform, but despite the promptings of Reader and Keri Ryan, Storm couldn't unlock a mean spirited Sharks' defence.
Three tries just after the hour mark sealed the away win, but South London had
the last word when the impressive Nwabueze showed presence of mind to pick up a
loose ball and power across the line from 10 yards out. Reader easily added the simple conversion.
Club captain Keri Ryan praised the efforts of his team, “We've shown a huge
improvement in the second half of the season, the players have really worked hard to turn things around at this club, and the results have improved.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article