As the dust settles, some thoughts arise on the shambles that was the Scottish election. First, it was a mistake to use three different voting systems for two levels of government on one day. The two Holyrood votes should not have been on one ballot paper.

The regional lists were a mess. In Mid-Scotland and Fife there were 16 options, eight starting with the word "Scottish". Perhaps we need to ask parties wishing to stand on the list to produce 50 nominations.

The regional list waters were muddied even more by the use of descriptions such as "Alex Salmond for First Minister". A stunningly successful tactic by the SNP, but it smacks of trickery. What next: Aardvarks for Aaron?

Given the number of invalid papers, any close result has to be treated as unreliable. In most circumstances that might not matter too much, but with 47 SNP MSPs and 46 Labour, and one seat where the SNP beat Labour by only 48 votes, clearly it's vital. All I can suggest is that any Holyrood result where the majority is less than 20% or 30% of the number of invalid papers should be re-run. That may be only a couple of seats.

Many council results must be at best dubious. In Perth and Kinross I saw numerous ballot papers with three SNP candidates' names and one cross against each. All were rejected, possibly affecting the re-distribution of votes under STV and the final result.

It was simply daft to start the count at 10pm, immediately the polls closed. We ended up with exhausted people making important decisions, a recipe for error. This election was an embarrassment for Scotland.

Doug Maughan, 52 Menteith View, Dunblane.