By midnight tonight, around 1.7m people will have played their part in one of the most popular and unexpected experiments in online democracy the UK has had.
For the past three months, from Land's End to Shetland, men and women have been putting their names and e-mail addresses to a petition on the Downing Street website calling for ministers to scrap all plans for road pricing.
Tracking and billing every vehicle in the country by satellite is not only "sinister and wrong", the new pay-by-the-mile tax will be unfair on those living apart from loved ones and the poor, runs the petition's rallying cry.
The threat of paying extra for the school run or a weekend drive has generated a huge response from the public, catching the government off-guard and prompting Tony Blair to promise a reply to all who sign the petition before it closes tonight.
But with the technology to pinpoint every vehicle on the road still a decade away and politicians scared of enraging the 74% of households regularly using a car, is the reaction proportionate?
The Westminster government has certainly put itself behind road pricing in theory, suggesting new charges could be offset by cutting fuel duty and road tax, and improving public transport to offer drivers an alternative.
The busiest roads would be the most expensive to drive on - estimates go up to £1.50 a mile - while quiet roads, such as those in rural areas, would be priced at the lowest level or not at all.
Last December, the idea seemed sealed when a Treasury report - for which read approved by Gordon Brown - warned congestion would cost the economy £22bn a year by 2025, the equivalent of £900 a household. Stephen Ladyman, UK roads minister, also declared recently that a national roads pricing scheme was "inevitable". However, 1.7 million angry voters are hard to ignore, and "inevitable" covers an awfully long time.
According to Paul Watters, head of roads and transport policy with the AA, a more likely short-term future is a series of local congestion schemes on the lines of the one pioneered in London by Mayor Ken Livingstone in 2003. Mr Watters said that over the next 10 to 15 years he expected Manchester to follow suit, and speculated Glasgow might dabble with the idea, despite the massive rejection of a congestion charge in Edinburgh.
"I think the government do understand motorists' sensitivities. The sad thing about what the government is doing is that it keeps telling us road pricing is worth thinking about, yet don't tell us how it's going to work in practice. People should be sceptical but not paranoid about it."
The difficulties certainly should not be underestimated. Vast, complicated and intrusive, any satellite tracking system would also need to be backed up by a massive billing system.
At the moment, the government cannot guarantee cars on the road are even taxed and insured. Why should rogue drivers be any keener to install a black box to monitor their every move, and pay up to £600 for the privilege?
Moreover, despite some talk of road pricing being piloted, it would need to arrive as a big bang''. It would be impossible to cut fuel duty in some parts of the country but not others without causing yet more congestion as people flocked to trial areas to fill their tanks cheaply.
Although tracking technology could be tested to generate notional bills, they would not change driver behaviour, making it difficult to say if a nationwide rollout would work.
In Scotland, where car ownership is lower than the rest of the UK, congestion policy is lagging behind Westminster. In part, this is because the UK government funds work on schemes south of the border. So far, 10 areas have been given money to develop congestion schemes, including Manchester and Bristol.
In Scotland, councils have also been chastened by the backlash to the early Edinburgh proposal.
Duncan McLaren, chief executive of Friends of the Earth Scotland, yesterday urged MSPs to look hard at congestion charging as an alternative to more road building.
However, when our politicians debate the issue at Holyrood on Thursday, they are more likely to be looking hard at their shoes as they avoid saying anything too contentious before the election.
A Scottish Labour spokesman last night said road pricing had "not been ruled outand doing nothing was not an option", but was not ready to name his party's particular prescription.
Fergus Ewing, SNP transport spokesman, said road pricing was "plainly a possible system", but not one which energised him. The Tories are fiercely opposed to any form of road charges.
The executive is pro-road pricing in theory, so long as it is part of a UK-wide scheme - as are the Scottish LibDems, although if UK reform remains "glacial" they would lobby for road and fuel tax to be devolved in order to scrap them and go it alone on pricing.
Have your say on the
Herald Forum
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article