Britain would probably need help from other countries to treat casualties in the event of a dirty bomb attack, a leading scientist said yesterday.
Professor Nigel Lightfoot, chief adviser to the head of the Health Protection Agency, said other countries had agreed to help Britain, in a reciprocal arangement.
Professor Lightfoot said that any dirty bomb - a device which combines conventional explosive with radiation - would probably cause more damage than the radiation released but the terror it would cause among the population would be "quite considerable".
He said there had been a "tremendous improvement" in the way Britain was facing such threats since 2001 but the authorities had not planned for the release of polonium-210, which was used to poison former spy Alexander Litvinenko, 43, an ex-KGB agent who had become a harsh critic of the Kremlin.
He died in hospital in London in November last year, three weeks after ingesting a large dose of the radioactive material.
More than 750 people were tested for exposure and around 130 were found to have come into contact with polonium-210.
Seventeen people had levels which might lead to an increase in their long-term risk of getting cancer. The substance was found at dozens of sites across London.
Russia refuses to extradite former KGB agent Andrei Lugovoy, who is wanted by British police over the death of Mr Litvinenko.
Professor Lightfoot said: "Quite honestly, we didn't have a polonium-210 plan. We never expected it to be a problem we would face."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article