The Scottish Government last Friday made the right choice for Lewis - a difficult choice in the current climate, I'm sure, but the right choice none the less, and for all the right reasons. I and many others would now encourage the ministers to be brave and take some other hard decisions whilst the urge is upon them, and to write three more letters - two in the same vein as Friday's to Lewis Wind Power. These two don't need to be 14 pages long; a paragragh will suffice. The headers could say that the government is mindful to reject the other two large wind-farm schemes proposed for Lewis. One should go to Nicolas Oppenheim (Beinn Mhor Power), private landlord of Eisgein Estate; the other to SSE for their proposed scheme for the Pairc District.
The other letter that could be written should be kept for the appropriate moment. That will be when the application for the Siadar Wave Energy Project lands on the ministers' desks. This project is the only one in the Western Isles to date which has progressed its way through the various official and public channels without outrage or controversy. It was first mooted by the local Shader Pier Group from the west side of Lewis, is being taken forward by NPower and Wavegen, and hopefully in the fullness of time will be consented.
It's time to let the Western Isles move on from large, harmful projects and for islanders to find their own solutions to their economic problems. No amount of pleading can fulfil the aspirations of the people and Comhairle nan Eilean Siar should now recognise this and move on and try to find fixes for the other social problems that beset us such as education provision for present and future generations and the public health of the community.
Time also for the local authority to recognise and act on its commissioned research, to act on the Outer Hebrides Migration Study, the Hi-Trans Study and to take forward Community Energy Projects. That should be enough to be going on with for a small group of islands. The Western Isles cannot take on the energy needs of society as a whole.
Iain Macleod, 22 Lower Shader, Isle of Lewis.
I saw a figure last week that the American military spent around $3tn prosecuting an invasion of Iraq. Just consider the amount of CO2 that has been released into the atmosphere between the manufacture of munitions transportation of personnel and all logistics on the ground and in the air. A wind farm on the Isle of Lewis, right in front of my window, or even hundreds of wind farms right throughout the UK, is not going to make the slightest difference to climate change.
Niall M Scott, 1 North Bragar, Isle of Lewis.
The SNP have spent the last few months telling us we don't need nuclear energy as Scotland is ideally placed to take advantage of wind power and other renewable energy. So why does it look now as if they are going to turn down the plans for a wind farm on Lewis?
They have also been saying they are in favour for more powers to local government. Is their only real policy to make any decision that will make them popular, in the short term at least?
Andy Moffat, 52 Bradda Ave, Rutherglen.
Scotland should surely promote its most successful industry: tourism. Carry on reopening its coal fields, not to back up wobbly wind, but to power new industry that doesn't depend on massive consumer-sourced subsidies.
Stop worrying about carbon footprints and enjoy the warmth of natural climate change while it lasts. Real evidence, not computer-driven scenarios, points to even better skiing in 2009. After all, the global average temperature record has now been unbroken for almost a decade.
Dr David Bellamy, The Mill House, Bishop Auckland, County Durham; Dr John Etherington, Parc-y-Bont, Llanhowell, Pembrokeshire.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article