FULL marks to Alex Salmond for his initiative in applying for representation at the UN nuclear weapons summit. He has long had support for saying "no" to Trident on our shores and we have the right to make our objections known to a wider world. Let's face it. Westminster isn't going to speak on our behalf.
Janet E Cunningham, 1 Cedar Avenue, Stirling.
Struan Stevenson MEP is surely being mischievous (Letters, October 18). While it is undeniable that the UK will have more influence in international affairs than the countries he mentions (Finland, Malta, etc), nevertheless the influence that each of these countries does wield remains, crucially, "their" influence.
This should not be underestimated. To give an obvious example, Scotland's policy on nuclear weapons would be different if it were developed independently of Westminster. Given the location of these terrible weapons on Scotland's west coast, of course this would be significant, hopefully in a positive way, in terms of the international situation.
R A Dziewialtowski, 72 Bankhall Street, Glasgow.
Struan Stevenson has a propensity for trotting out tired old arguments as witnessed by his spectacularly irrelevant letter about the United Kingdom's influence as compared to the likes of Malta and Luxembourg. The point, that he is perfectly well aware of, is Scotland's lack of influence, even at a UK level. Of course maybe he adheres to the "we're too wee" philosophy that has blighted this country for so long. After all, we can't hope to be independent and rub shoulders with huge nations such as Andorra and Lichtenstein can we?
David C Purdie, 12 Mayburn Vale, Loanhead, Midlothian.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article