Ian Bell's Saturday essay on Zimbabwe was timely in highlighting the dilemmas facing any who care about that country and its people. I returned from Zimbabwe last week after a brief visit to close friends and I saw some remarkable projects that continue to serve the poorest and most vulnerable.
I am a veteran of demonstrations, not least against Ian Smith's Rhodesia and apartheid South Africa. It is tempting to take the same path over Robert Mugabe's Zimbabwe, and that seems to be the direction being considered by the Prime Minister over the extension of sanctions.
Such a course would annoy the President and those who surround him, but I am far from convinced that it would assist the suffering people of Zimbabwe. Their unemployment and increasing poverty is related to the isolation of their country and the meltdown of investment.
The picture painted of Zimbabwe is of a country that has already collapsed. To go around Harare as I did is to find a city that, incredibly, is still functioning. Yes, the economy is dependent on a black market that changes daily and there are shortages (but not emptiness) in the shops.
But plenty of cars move around, people go about their business and a white visitor is greeted with warmth and courtesy in a way no different from before.
I do not doubt the violent suppression of dissent but I saw no evidence of the police and army presence on the streets that I have seen in other countries where civic society has all but broken down. I found considerable anger from my Zimbabwean friends (every one of whom strongly opposes the present regime) over press reports that imply that nothing is functioning or happening and over some scenes shot by the media which they identify as doctored from outside.
This does a disservice to the amazing resilience that is such a characteristic in Africa, where 90% of the population struggle for food and necessities and the allocation of farms to select "comrades" has run down agriculture. But when I visited Ghana in 1982 amid an economic crisis, worse shortages and more catastrophic breakdowns had not broken the spirit, nor paralysed activity. So it is in Zimbabwe. Further isolation of Zimbabwe by the colonial power will just fuel paranoia among those in power.
The South African option which I have been critical of in the past, still seems to offer some hope of change. Reports there are that Thabo Mbeki has injected a new urgency on realistic talks with the opposition. Both MDC and Zanu PF are deeply divided but it cannot be long before a government of national unity will replace the present regime.
For Britain to attempt another "regime change" in Africa, this time allying itself with Australia and other predominantly white nations, bypassing and ignoring African efforts, might make some of us who care deeply about Zimbabwe feel good. It will do nothing for some of those victims of the appalling Operation Murambatsvina whom I met last week.
We owe it to them and to our other Zimbabwean friends to walk the difficult tightrope between collusion with a dying regime and colonial collision. We will not make headlines but it may be more statesmenlike.
Rev Dr Iain Whyte, 14 Carlingnose Point, North Queensferry.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article