Ian Bell's Saturday essay (Lockerbie: a disgraceful episode for Scots law, June 30) should be compulsory reading for all jurists and politicians. In an excoriating and penetrating analysis, Mr Bell exposed the political hypocrisy that has dogged this tragedy from the beginning.
In arguing that, internationally, the "integrity of the Scottish legal system, once co-respondent in the birth of the European Enlightenment, was treated as a joke", he poses the question: "Is it to remain a joke?"
As a proud Scot who for 18 years has watched the courageous Lockerbie relatives fight for the truth in the face of political procrastination and cover-up, this is a crucial question that every one of us should be asking.
Mr Bell's essay has, of course, even more resonance following last week's attacks in London and Glasgow.
Terrorism is abhorrent and those responsible should be chased to the grave, but dissembling politicians who prevent their capture in the name of some greater good, and effectively do their work for them, shame the very office they hold.
Forgive me if I treat our leaders' present call to be strong and vigilant in the face of terrorism and to trust in their judgment with just a pinch of salt when the memory of the 270 souls who perished at Lockerbie deserved so much more than their political intrigue, weakness and vacillation.
Yes, Scotland was handed a poisoned chalice by the American and UK governments in being asked to be the complainer, judge and jury in a tragedy not of its own making.
Have we now the will to right these wrongs and restore faith in the Scottish justice system?
Iain A J McKie, 27 Donnini Court, South Beach Road, Ayr.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article