Puerile prince
During a rather fumbling interview on Channel 4 on Friday, Prince William said: "Heaven forbid that I should listen to classical music." So far as I know, no-one has yet called him to account, as future king, for this irresponsible remark.

It was not merely an expression of personal taste, but rather of prejudice and ignorance. It was a slap in the face for our royal schools of music, all the internationally famous symphony orchestras in the UK - including the Royal Philharmonic - our chamber ensembles and soloists, the universally admired Master of the Queen's Music, Sir Peter Maxwell Davies, and British-based recording companies such as Delphian of Edinburgh - "the classical label in the city".

If the prince chooses to take pride in such puerile notions, that is his loss, but he should keep it to himself. He certainly shouldn't invoke Heaven to make a virtue of it.

Professor David Wilde, pianist/composer, 25 Torphichen Street, Bathgate.

Not linked to MMR
I have no answer for John Henery (Letters, June 30) but would like it to be known that I have no doubt that it was not inoculation that caused the Asperger's Syndrome which my son was only officially diagnosed with at the age of 30. He is now 33.

I felt from only months and even weeks old, that he might be autistic.

I now know that in international thinking Asperger's only appears around three years of age but is part of Autism Spectrum Disorder, and autism by definition is evident before the age of 30 months and usually apparent in the first year of life, so I had no difficulty with the final diagnosis.

I hope it may be of some help to know that, for my son, receiving the diagnosis and the interviews that led to that, were helpful for him understanding why he feels as he does and also for us as a family.

Karine Davison, 3 Ettrick Drive, Bearsden.

Statistically in error
Your Business page headline (July 2) was mistaken in saying the survey of Scottish firms, asked how an SNP-led executive would affect business in Scotland, revealed "only 25% of firms were upbeat". In the article, it says that, while 25% thought the impact would be good, 20% thought it would be bad: ie, more thought the impact would be good than thought it would be bad. Given that the SNP executive has had less than two months to make an impact of any kind, I suspect the 38% who thought it had made no significant difference are probably closest to the truth.

Andrew M Fraser, Cradlehall Cottage, Caulfield Road North, Inverness.