For the past two decades Scotland has had an excess of electrical generation capacity and has been annually exporting a great deal of electricity to England. Strangely, no-one ever asks why this is the case.

Just why did Scotland emerge with such a massive excess of generating capacity in the early 1980s? Who sanctioned this state of affairs and was it done for the benefit of Scotland?

Ironically, we are back to the issue of nuclear power stations.

When Mrs Thatcher became Prime Minister, the miners were perceived to have too much power. To dish them, it was decided, inter alia, that we should have a couple more nuclear power stations; and where better to put one than Scotland, where planning permission existed for six reactors at Torness. At that time, Scotland did not need such a station. We were not short of generating capacity and another nuclear power station with a capacity of 1200mW would give us an extraordinary excess. Indeed, the select committee report in 1981 could find no good reason why this power station was being built.

But a pliable SSEB duly obliged and Torness was completed at a cost of £2500m.

Torness was never justified in capacity or economic terms. Indeed, it caused substantial economic damage to Scotland by keeping electricity prices higher than they need have been, since, during the construction phase, the interest on the capital borrowed was charged to the ongoing price of electricity in the SSEB area.

All that is water under the bridge although the subject is surely deserving of a little further investigation to expose just who the culprits were. But at least we can rest assured that we now have an SNP government in Edinburgh, and this time round Scotland will not have an unwanted and unnecessary nuclear power station foisted upon us again just to suit a Westminster political need.

Nick Dekker, 1 Nairn Way, Cumbernauld.