logo
   Web Issue 3272 October 7 2008   
spacer




Rude, predictable and deeply dull
DAVID BELCHERMarch 31 2007

Wedding Belles
Channel 4, 10pm
Mummy's war
Channel 4, 9pm

Ding-dong, ya pure mad wee radge! Wedding Belles found the scabrous sage of Muirhouse, Irvine Welsh, up to his usual loud and shocking shenanigans again. He's a proper monkey for waging war on bourgeois society's perceptions of the feckless post-industrial under-class and all that, is Irv.

So jings, crivvens and help ma boab if we didn't once again have our snooty, well-to-do noses rubbed in some frightful imaginary hard-core realism, dears.

Wedding Belles offered us four feisty burds in wedding dresses storming about Leith, swearing too much, smoking crack, kidnapping a priest and conducting late-night gangland-style executions. When the four weren't doing that sort of malarkey - routine around Leith, apparently - they were staging the hilarious business of calling adults with learning difficulties "mongs" and advocating the benefits of intimate plastic surgery. Charged with giving a graphic demonstration of the latter's cosmetic worth, Michelle Gomez wound up startling a passing postman. She's always an eyeful, Ms Gomez - but you couldn't help feeling she was terribly wasted in Wedding Belles.

Elsewhere, it was priapic OAPs experiencing an all-too-prominent hardening of the arteries (yon Viagra) or pegging out while clad in bondage gear.

There was much more graceless, charmless stuff, too. Shocked? I almost dropped my syringe. Or, in other words, I wasn't shocked at all, just bored and mildly scunnered. Irvine's shtick boils down to predictable cartoonery and rude slogans.

As political protest placards go, one soon stood out in Mummy's War. You had to respect its sentiments, while deploring its errant spelling and wonky grasp of idiomatic English. There it was, amid various placards being brandished by angry Argentinians greeting a new arrival to Buenos Aires airport: "You Are Non Pleasing Person, Thacher."

Sadly, it was the wrong Thacher - or, as the placard should of course have read, "Thatcher" - who was being protested against: the lumberingly eccentric Carol, rather than her frightful mater, Mrs Margaret.

Poor Carol, guilty only of being a 10-watt lightbulb, albeit a jolly enthusiastic one. Nevertheless, in bidding to establish the lasting effects of the Falklands conflict in this, the year of its 25th anniversary, dutiful daughter Carol wound up copping some blame for mummy's war.

Mummy's War actually turned out to be as much about mummy's girl and the maternal shadow under which she toils as it was about that crazy conflict in the South Atlantic. There was a moment early in the programme, as Carol bustled about her flat packing clothes for her chilly trip - "Layers, Carol, layers!" - that provided a fleeting insight into her girlhood, ineradicably scarred by Maggie's election as an MP when Carol was six. "She was more of a politician than a mum," Carol confided, her tone coloured with the tiniest shade of accusation, dolour and self-pity, before moving briskly on: "But never mind!"

There was an equally revelatory millisecond when Carol's 18-hour flight to the Falklands touched down at Port Stanley International (a small group of corrugated hangars). "Is this it?" Carol said in a confused, childlike tone, inferring no cosmopolitan disappointment at the airport's bleak locale. Rather, she seemed genuinely baffled as to where she might be. (If her mum had been there, she might have got a clout round the ear for asking such a daft question.) Off the plane and skipping along the runway with girlish glee, Carol hugged a plastic replica Falklands penguin, asking its name and wondering whether she'd be allowed to see some real ones.

Carol? The poor dear gel's a lamb. Shame about her mum and that bally war of hers, mind.

david.belcher@theherald.co.uk


© All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Posted by: Daisy Bremner, Leith on 1:45am Fri 30 Mar 07
It was fantastic. It's amazing, isn't it, that all the English reviews have said how great it is. You're a bitter sad little hack Belcher. Going nowhere very fast.
Posted by: Tony Muldoon, Muirhouse on 1:50am Fri 30 Mar 07
Why even respond to Belcher? He's a frustrated writer. He wouldn't know good TV if it accosted him in the street. Sad wee man. I thought Wedding Belles was a great farce, nothing more nothing less. A great two hours of blistering entertainment.
Posted by: Irvine Quelch, Leith on 4:59pm Fri 30 Mar 07
One English review - in the Guardian by that fool Sam Woolaston - liked Wedding Belles. No other English paper did; they hated it... but why do you need your view validated by English critics anyway, Daisy? why the cringing lack of native confidence in our media? The Scotsman slated Wedding Belles, too, because Irvine Welsh is a sad, bitter, frustrated one-trick pony who's going nowhere faster than anybody.
Posted by: Kurt Munro, Edinburgh on 5:31pm Fri 30 Mar 07
Wedding Belles was the best thing on tv in a while. With cheap badly written crap like Doctor Who on our screens we should appreciate shows like this when they come around once in a blue moon. Shameless is getting old, so I hope they can turn this into a new series.

The only negative thing reviews like this can muster, is that the "shocking" moments didn't shock them. It's high school-like behaviour, such as coming out of a scary movie and saying "That wasn't even scary." Grow up.

Here's my taste in movies if you think I'm some Scream 4 loving chav: One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, Citizen Kane, Blade Runner, Pulp Fiction, Magnolia, The Big Lebowski, Taxi Driver, etc.
Posted by: Paula Burns, Edinburgh on 2:21pm Sat 31 Mar 07
Irvine Quelch wrote:
One English review - in the Guardian by that fool Sam Woolaston - liked Wedding Belles. No other English paper did; they hated it... but why do you need your view validated by English critics anyway, Daisy? why the cringing lack of native confidence in our media? The Scotsman slated Wedding Belles, too, because Irvine Welsh is a sad, bitter, frustrated one-trick pony who's going nowhere faster than anybody.
Yeah, that's a really funny pseudonym. Maybe you should try write a screenplay? Dullard! The English press are amazed at how much stick Welsh comes in for from the Scottish hacks.

Wedding Belles is being lauded as a great piece of TV. The lack of "confidence" in our media is because they are very small minded conservatives and a bit of a laughing stock.
Posted by: Rose, Glasgow on 12:36am Mon 2 Apr 07
Kathryn Flett in The Guardian like it too (I'm pretty sure she's English). Her review is online. I loved Wedding Belles. Shirley Henderson in particular was excellent.
Posted by: James, London on 4:14pm Tue 3 Apr 07
Stop moaning you **** porridge wogs.
Posted by: AA Gill, The Big Smoke on 1:53pm Thu 5 Apr 07
"This was essentially a cartoon-grotesque, clumsily written small-screen pastiche of Quentin Tarantino meets Reckless."
AA Gill, The Sunday Times
Posted by: Rocky Raccoon, Dreadville, Englandshire on 1:56pm Thu 5 Apr 07
Daisy Bremner plainly equals Hibs icon Des Bremner plainly equals... Irvine Welsh! I claim my five pounds! Hoorah!
Add your comment
Please note: to publish your comment you must be registered on this site. If you are already registered, please enter your details below.
Email:
Password:




spacer
 IN YOUR AREA
 
Herald Appointments - Every Friday
Travel Shop
Airport Parking
Travel Insurance
Copyright © 2008 Newsquest (Herald & Times) Limited. All Rights Reserved   
Sitemap :: Circulation :: Syndication :: Advertising :: About Us :: Terms of Use