Weekly round-up
Surrey Championship Div 2 1st eleven
Beddington v shepperton
Lost
Beddington 164
Shepperton 169-5
After losing the toss on a poor wicket at Shepperton Beddo were asked to bat first and struggled to 164 in 46 overs.
Tony Cummings again scored a solid 38 in reply to Beddo total Shepperton gained the win with two overs to spare and fully deserved their win.
Surrey Championship Div 1 2nd eleven
Beddington v Limpsfield
Win Draw
Limpsfield 222
Beddington 121
Beddington won the toss and duly inserted Limpsfield who quickly moved to 50-1 before Beddington could make any inroads into the attack.
The middle order took them to 130-3 but then had a collapse to 150-6 before good batting rallied them to 190-6.
Dan Lewis returned to bowled them out for 222, finishing with 5-62 with Dunthorne 3-56.
In reply to Limpsfield's total Beddington had one hour and 45 minutes and the last 20 to score 222, but rain stopped play after Beddo had reached 30 for no wicket.
40 minutes was lost for rain and once play began Beddington quickly lost Lester. It was left to Tibble (70) and Arnold (41) to take the game to the bowlers to reach 120-2. At the last 20 where upon Beddington lost Arnold.
Gardner (40) and Tibble carried on the fight to take Beddington to the brink with 40 required of the last five overs but Limpsfield's bowlers fought back to take Tibble and Gardner quickly together which saved Limpsfield from defeat. Fine hitting from Sturt and Murphy took Beddington to 209, 11 runs short and secured the well deserved win draw.
Surrey Championship Div 2 3rd eleven
Beddington v Leatherhead
Lost
Beddington 100 all out Ball 43
Leatherhead 100-5
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article