ROYAL LYCEUM THEATRE
EDINBURGH
***
One wonders what the poet W H Auden, the original lyricist of Dale Wasserman's 1965 musical, would've made of this Spanish Inquisition-set play within a play. In having an incarcerated Cervantes attempt to save his skin (and his unpublished manuscript) by acting out Don Quixote's hapless adventures in a world gone mad, Auden's approach might have been somewhat darker than Joe Darion's, who got the gig with composer Mitch Leigh after Auden had, somewhat ironically, been taken off the project.
As it is, much of Martin Duncan's boutique revival is an appealingly knockabout and throwaway romp with the air of an extended Two Ronnies sketch.
Only in the second half does Quixote/Cervantes argue that through poetry and fantasy can life's pains be forgotten. True as that may be, such notions sound like a voguish fancy of the play's 1960s origins. Duncan's masterstroke is to have his cast of 12 double up as an onstage band. The effect, under the guidance of musical director Robert Pettigrew, is to create a junkyard orchestra which adds to the ongoing fantastical intent on Francis O'Connor's expansive, roughshod set.
This makes for some grandly impressive tableaux, which lend proceedings a strength and grandeur they probably don't deserve. Nicholas Pound's appositely under-wrought rendition of The Impossible Dream, a paean to the power of the imagination, is the only real stand-out. It's nevertheless a treat to see Pauline Knowles take centre stage as feisty love interest Aldonza in a handsomely realised, but largely inconsequential, affair.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article