logo
   Web Issue 3147 May 14 2008   
spacer
Don’t get mad... relax, smile and just walk away
JENNIFER CUNNINGHAMMay 16 2007
PAYING THE PRICE: John Sweeney
PAYING THE PRICE: John Sweeney "losing it" on YouTube.

Road rage, air rage and trolley rage have become almost commonplace. Interview rage, as displayed by both Panorama investigator John Sweeney and his interviewee, Tommy Davis of the Church of Scientology, on Monday evening's programme, boosted the ratings but added nothing to our understanding of Scientology. Sweeney has apologised for "inappropriate behaviour" and cringes at the clip in which he looks like "an exploding tomato".

For observers of human confrontation, it was a classic situation, heightened by the fact that the Scientologists turned their own cameras on the programme- makers and both "sides" were under considerable pressure.

"The trouble is, people get into competitive situations and need to be right. Because we have to reach some kind of outcome during a TV programme and because adrenalin is flowing in both bloodstreams, people tend to go over the top much more easily, whether it is in interviews or any other kind of performance," says Ben Williams, an Edinburgh-based chartered corporate psychologist.

In the view of Mike Fisher, director of the British Association of Anger Management, John Sweeney does not have an anger management problem. "You saw him ranting and raving, then he calmed down. He went up a few decibels and then he calmed down again. He had four or five days of the stress of people following him."

In Fisher's view, Davis handled his anger better than Sweeney during the shouting-match. "Davis said: I am angry with you' and turned his back and walked away. He knew he was going to blow. He handled that like a master: he said he was angry and gave a warning that he was not going to be responsible for what happened," he says.

Despite his admiration, he does not feel that Davis won the confrontation. "It was about two men with fairly big egos crossing swords and the extreme nature of the conditions Sweeney was working under had got to him. I think that is a very exceptional situation," says Fisher, who admits that despite working in anger management for 12 years, "when I get extremely stressed out, everything I have ever learned will go right out the window".

Williams prefers a more subtle approach, suggesting that the best way to tackle someone in a situation like Sweeney's is to "ask them to explain their views and lead them down a path which would make them seem more and more ridiculous. Let the public draw their own conclusions rather than having to win in front of the public and put the other guy down. It doesn't make anyone angry. The guy goes away happy, because he's told everyone he's the king of the world. The interviewer wanted to win' when he should not have been going for that."

It is a lesson he thinks can equally be applied to real life. In essence, he sees examples of anger such as road rage as simply bad manners, which he defines as "a lack of concern for the other person at the expense of your own interest". He adds: "We tend to live at a much higher pace than ever before and people are less willing to take time out and just think.

"People often drive while listening to loud, fast-paced music when they should be listening to quieter, slower music. People walking along the road cannot greet each other because they are on their mobile phone or listening to an iPod."

Declaring himself an optimist, he says: "It will swing back. People are beginning to come home and switch off the radio and not watch television. What seems to be terribly cool now, will be incredibly naff in 10 years."

there was a satisfying sense of justice in the sentence of mopping and cleaning handed to supermodel Naomi Campbell for throwing a mobile phone at her cleaner. That, combined with the details of the five-day parade of designer outfits in which she turned up for work at New York's sanitation department in March, served to obscure the fact that she also had to attend a two-day anger-management course as part of her sentence.

When I get extremely stressed, everything I have learned about control will just go out the window

While two days seems a remarkably short time in which to change ingrained behaviour, both Williams and Fisher are confident that the most volatile people can be taught to manage their anger. In Fisher's view, they are usually "individuals who have probably suffered from quite severe trauma, which has been unprocessed for a very long time". He explains: "A lot of incidents which may be no big deal to an adult can be very traumatic to children. When a child is told off at a very young age, they start to experience shame instead of guilt. Guilt is the feeling that you made a mistake, but shame is the feeling that you are a mistake.

"After that, every time you say anything to them, they act defensively. If you take anger and deconstruct it, you have hurt and fear: anger is not the primary feeling - that is fear."

The root cause is often low self-esteem. "Usually when people have low self-esteem, their parents and their grandparents have low self-esteem. We tell people that they have to identify what their needs are and be able to say I am angry with you because you are not listening to me'." Fisher admits to envying people who have healthy self-esteem and an ability to cope with challenges, confrontations or threats on a daily basis. "They are very clear about what they want and need, they are very clear about being assertive and they are also very emotionally sophisticated, because they have this extraordinary skill set which most of us don't have. I hate them for it, because I am so jealous."

He admits that he has had to work to overcome his own anger problems.

"I have had to be hyper-vigilant because only in the last two years have I really been able to relax. I come from a whole family of rage-oholics. The paradox is that we never saw our father or mother scream or shout. I used to terrorise my younger sister and she would do all the venting. That personality type is the winder-upper, who gets other people to express all their unexpressed anger. Sometimes parents who are not expressing their own anger are getting their children to do it for them. I used to be an imploder - a passive-aggressive type - but when I became an exploder, all hell broke loose. I tried to get support, but could not find it and so identified a gap in the market." After training in Florida, he set up the British Association of Anger Management.

His latest round of two-day courses across the country has just been cancelled due to lack of interest; or perhaps the £580 cost. Self-help comes much cheaper courtesy of the YouTube clip of Sweeney. As the reporter puts it so ruefully: "This is a fine example of how not to do it it makes me cringe."

Keep a lid on it
These six tips will help keep your temper under control:

  • Look at the bigger picture.

  • Remember that it's OK to have a different opinion to others.

  • Opinions are not facts. They are only what you think.

  • Learn: In order to learn, listen.

    Observe: Look at the other person's body language.

    Verify: Clarify information.

    Empathise: Keep your heart open.

  • Use your support network.

  • Keep a diary.

    Source: British Association of Anger Management


  • © All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


    Posted by: Al Scott, Perth on 10:08am Wed 16 May 07
    "I Fisher's view, Davis handled his anger better than Sweeney during the shouting-match. "Davis said: I am angry with you' and turned his back and walked away. He knew he was going to blow. He handled that like a master: he said he was angry and gave a warning that he was not going to be responsible for what happened," he says."

    I'm afraid I find Fisher very naive in this. Davis wasn't handling his anger. His actions throughout the programme were clearly a well-used technique comprising a combination of :
    * arriving unexpectedly,
    * interrupting other interviews/conversations,
    * invading the reporter's personal space by getting right in his face
    every time
    * haranguing the reporter without drawing breath (whether "angry" or
    not) so as not to let him get a word in,
    * walking away when his performance was finished and to avoid
    actually having to address any points put to him.
    This was all for the benefit of his own cameras and it was this which prevented more information from being imparted. From a high-level official of an organisatioin calling itself a religion it was very scary indeed.

    Posted by: Hannah, Sussex, England on 5:56pm Wed 16 May 07
    People need to find out for themselves and not rely on John Sweeney to tell them what they should think about a religion. I am proud to be a Scientologist, it has helped me tremendously and I see how much help it has given to others. Of course we are anti-psychiatry... just look at the amount of suicides caused by psychiatric anti-depressants!!! Yes - we can get people off drugs, we can help someone that is illiterate and make the able man on the street more able and successful in his/her life. I suggest one looks at both sides to the story before deciding Sweeny has the answers...
    check out bbc panorama - exposed . org
    Posted by: Joe Steven, Stirling on 1:53am Thu 17 May 07
    Al Scott is spot on there regarding that Davis creep.

    Hannah - snap out of it love.
    Posted by: Kay, London on 9:48am Thu 17 May 07
    Tommy Davis was performing. He knew exactly what he was doing. There are well trained Scientology thugs who get taught how to try to turn the tables on any and all critics by asking what are they, the critics, are hiding and denigrate those who the critics cite as references. It's a basic phychological tool, although a Scientologists wouldn't claim to believe in psychology.

    It's because it doesn't want it's members to know when they're being duped and brainwashed and the real source for their sinister methods, the exact same kind of psychological mind games featured in the exhibition on the evils of psychology.
    Posted by: Dr. N on 11:52am Thu 17 May 07
    The documentary I felt was well balanced and showed John Sweeney to be a true hero of modern journalism. It would have been totally balanced apart from the spokes person, who has probably mysteriously disappeared.

    Not many people will have spotted this I guess if you haven't studied human behavioural patterns and Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP), but the scientologist was trying to use these methods on John during the entire footage, which is odd as I thought they hated Psychiatry.

    John if you're reading this... the outburst which you can not explain is caused by sensory overload, which is normally used during interrogation exercises. I'm not entirely sure how they get away with making a side show out of it. Very perplexing as subliminal advertising is banned in the many countries, and should fall under the same ruling.
    Posted by: Arnie Lerma, USA on 5:28pm Thu 17 May 07

    Everyhing in scientology is contrived.
    The nasty piece of work who was inciting Mr Sweeney was using a written policy of Scientology titled:

    REPORTER TRS

    You can find it on google.

    Having read it, there is no question what was really happenning here.

    Posted by: Bruce on 7:55pm Thu 17 May 07
    If you really want to know the source of Scientology, you must read Hubbard's book "A History of Man"

    Even if all you possess is schooldays knowledge of natural history and evolution, you'll see just how absurd the whole business is.

    With particular reference to Piltdown Man who had a nasty habit of eating his wife - google it. Best fun I've had in ages reading this (obviously) drug-induced rubbish.
    Posted by: Annie on 9:36am Fri 18 May 07
    In the end the whole thing has created an interest in the subject that wasnt there before. People will have been drawn in by the spectacle of John Sweeney 'losing it' who wouldnt otherwise have bothered. anyone who looks at what Scientology is all about ,will be able to tell for themselve what non-sense it represents - as a naive 18 year old some almost thirty years ago, I was briefly drawn in, and quickly spotted the many problems with it - it isnt on the level of a 'brainwashing cult' but it is ridiculous. On the anger front - anger serves a healthy purpose - to tell us when something is wrong - an aparent absence of anger can be a dangerous thing - its only when its chronic and/or out of control that theres a real problem. There is such a thing as justifiable anger and I think we saw it here.
    Posted by: MAKE UP, YOUR OWN MIND on 5:02pm Wed 23 May 07
    All anybody needs to know about these guys is in the THETAN teachings, where Xenu from the Galactic Confederacy explains how 75million years ago billions or people were brought to earth in space vevicles rather like Douglas DC-8's, placed around volcanoes, and vaporised with hydrogen bombs !!!
    All these "souls" were therefore vaporised, and on settling, stuck to the bodies of the living, thus producing "Body Thetans"..........ne
    ed I write any more of this TOSH to you all...............bu
    t I didn't ...nay, COULDN'T make it up !! This is for real.so make up yer own mind...is this YOUR idea of a sensible religious group????
    Posted by: Rab The Man, WAS MY UNCLE on 5:04pm Wed 23 May 07
    Hannah wrote:
    People need to find out for themselves and not rely on John Sweeney to tell them what they should think about a religion. I am proud to be a Scientologist, it has helped me tremendously and I see how much help it has given to others. Of course we are anti-psychiatry... just look at the amount of suicides caused by psychiatric anti-depressants!!! Yes - we can get people off drugs, we can help someone that is illiterate and make the able man on the street more able and successful in his/her life. I suggest one looks at both sides to the story before deciding Sweeny has the answers... check out bbc panorama - exposed . org
    Hannah Hen.......
    .........yer a numpty...Sorry...but you need serious help
    Add your comment
    Please note: to publish your comment you must be registered on this site. If you are already registered, please enter your details below.
    Email:
    Password:




    spacer
     IN YOUR AREA
     
    Herald Appointments - Every Friday
    Travel Shop
    Airport Parking
    Travel Insurance
    Copyright © 2008 Newsquest (Herald & Times) Limited. All Rights Reserved   
    Sitemap :: Circulation :: Syndication :: Advertising :: About Us :: Terms of Use