Ten years after the death of their son, the parents of a young man found dead in Wick Harbour in 1997 are to receive an unreserved apology from the chief constable of Northern Constabulary for the way he and his force handled their complaints about the police investigation into his death. In the intervening years, Hugh and June McLeod's distress has been compounded by the way the police have handled a series of complaints from the family. When the first Police Complaints Commissioner for Scotland (PCCS), Jim Martin, took up his post in April this year, their complaint was one of the first to land on his desk. He has now issued his report, which is deeply critical of Northern Constabulary and its chief constable, Ian Latimer.
This is the second time Mr Martin has ordered a force to apologise to someone making a complaint. Last month, he asked Strathclyde Police to apologise to the family of a 14-year-old youth who was held in a police cell for 59 hours. In that incident, Mr Martin found there was in Strathclyde Police "what appears to be a systemic failure in relation to the detention in custody of children". In the case of the McLeod family, he comes to a not dissimilar conclusion that the attitude taken towards the family by the police "smacks at times of institutional arrogance". His report, which also criticises some of the McLeods' actions, makes a number of general recommendations about more prompt responses, but, crucially, recommends that Mr Latimer personally meets with the family. One of the main grievances expressed by almost all complainants against public bodies is that they don't receive an apology when things go wrong. This is routine to avoid anything which could be construed as an admission of guilt in any subsequent legal action, but that need not always preclude an expression of genuine regret.
One of the significant factors in this case is that Mr Martin says that if the family had not used the Freedom of Information Act to gain access to a report by the chief constable of Central Scotland Police into how Northern Constabulary had handled their complaints, the extent of their shortcomings would not have come to light. That underlines the lack of transparency which is at the root of so many complaints. In this case, some of the difficulties between the police and the family (who believe their son's death was not properly investigated) stem from a delay in providing them with information, such as the post-mortem results. That is a different issue from the handling of the subsequent complaints, but where complaints are not responded to seriously and courteously, the effect is that suspicion is deepened rather than allayed. Mr Martin, a former teacher, says that should be the lesson in this case. It also demonstrates how prone to "institutional arrogance" public bodies such as the police can be and that if that remains unchecked, it is soon followed by public distrust.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article