Stiff test lies ahead
It was a coronation, not an election. In keeping with the manner of her seamless elevation to the leadership of the Scottish Labour Party, all but ratified yesterday when she was confirmed as the sole nominee to succeed Jack McConnell, Wendy Alexander will tour Scotland with an ear to the ground, rather than a megaphone. The hearts, minds and votes she must win are the Scottish public's. Those of her party are in the bag. She will not officially become leader until September 14, when Labour MSPs and the executive meet to hand her the party crown. Or will it turn out to be a poisoned chalice?
As Gerry Hassan pointed out in The Herald yesterday, Ms Alexander is the fourth Labour leader in the reconvened Scottish Parliament's history, none of whom has been elected with a proper contest. The lack of any challenger, far less a substantive one, to Ms Alexander has not only denied Labour's grassroots a say in the new leader; more importantly, it has closed the door on the wider public having an opportunity to listen in on a debate about the party's future direction. On both counts this is regrettable as democracy can thrive only when the public feels fully engaged in its processes, whether at party or
government level.
Now that she no longer needs to campaign over the next three weeks or so for the top job, Ms Alexander can use the time to get to know the electorate. This she plans to do with a tour of Scotland. She has identified four policy areas where she wants to make a mark as a reformer by laying out proposals in the weeks ahead to deliver a competitive yet compassionate economy; consumer-focused public services; empowered people and communities; and Scottish solutions for Scottish aspirations. In addition, she plans to reform the party to reverse the decline in membership and make it more electable.
If she thought her workload as a minister under Mr McConnell was excessive (she did, because she resigned from his government) she might not have seen anything yet. As leader of the biggest opposition party, she must hold to account an SNP executive led by a popular First Minister, Alex Salmond, who has reinvented himself, managing in the process to cast off a reputation for arrogance (though not all voters are convinced). He is Ms Alexander's intellectual equal but can reach out to speak to the layman and woman in a way that, thus far, has eluded Ms Alexander.
She has many challenges to rise to, not the least of which could be the risk of alienating public service workers, many of whom are Labour rank-and-file supporters, should her desire to make the public sector put the consumer first, not the producer, result in reform that was, in their eyes, unpalatable. Also, how far will she be prepared to go to advance Scottish solutions with the Prime Minister, to whom she has been close? Will she dust down an old pet policy, fiscal autonomy, to demonstrate credentials as a supporter of more powers for
Holyrood, knowing it was anathema to Gordon Brown's Treasury?
Ms Alexander is different from her three predecessors in one fundamental regard. They led a party in power. She will lead a party badly bruised by an electoral defeat that knocked it from the number one perch it had held in Scotland for some 50 years, in terms of votes and seats. Ms Alexander has many qualities. They will be tested to the full in an uncertain constitutional landscape as she strives to make Labour electable again.
© All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without
permission is prohibited.

Posted by: Scottish Politics, Scotland on 11:07pm Tue 21 Aug 07
We are continually told by the media that Ms Alexander is an intellectual behemoth astride the Scottish political stage but there is precious little evidence thus far to support the claims. Indeed, many commentators have referred to her as being "politically naive" in the past.
Wendy also admitted in a letter to Jim Sillars that "One of the last times the Labour Movement in Scotland made a real intellectual contribution to the UK Labour Party was in 1906." As someone who has been a member of the Labour Party in Scotland, surely Wendy is equally culpable in this.
Add to this an inability to display humility and the common touch and you have an Opposition leader who must have the SNP rubbing their hands.
We are continually told by the media that Ms Alexander is an intellectual behemoth astride the Scottish political stage but there is precious little evidence thus far to support the claims. Indeed, many commentators have referred to her as being "politically naive" in the past.
Wendy also admitted in a letter to Jim Sillars that "One of the last times the Labour Movement in Scotland made a real intellectual contribution to the UK Labour Party was in 1906." As someone who has been a member of the Labour Party in Scotland, surely Wendy is equally culpable in this.
Add to this an inability to display humility and the common touch and you have an Opposition leader who must have the SNP rubbing their hands.
Posted by: Mac, Dundee on 11:58am Wed 22 Aug 07
Des Browne as Scottish Secretary has already said "no" to new powers for the Scottish parliament, and he would know the mind of Gordon Brown on this. So too Wendy Alexander since Gordon Brown is her patron.
So the real test for Wendy Alexander is how is she to going to convince Scots that her policy of "Scottish solutions for Scottish aspirations" can be realised within the current devolution structure.
A failure to convince, as seems likely, will do her immense damage within the Labour party.
Des Browne as Scottish Secretary has already said "no" to new powers for the Scottish parliament, and he would know the mind of Gordon Brown on this. So too Wendy Alexander since Gordon Brown is her patron.
So the real test for Wendy Alexander is how is she to going to convince Scots that her policy of "Scottish solutions for Scottish aspirations" can be realised within the current devolution structure.
A failure to convince, as seems likely, will do her immense damage within the Labour party.
Posted by: Los Angeles, Edinburgh on 3:17pm Wed 22 Aug 07
[quote]So the real test for Wendy Alexander is how is she to going to convince Scots that her policy of "Scottish solutions for Scottish aspirations" can be realised within the current devolution structure.[/quote] True, but the test is whether she means it or whether it is the expected window dressing ....after all, it's not what Labour believed before the election ....
So the real test for Wendy Alexander is how is she to going to convince Scots that her policy of "Scottish solutions for Scottish aspirations" can be realised within the current devolution structure.
True, but the test is whether she means it or whether it is the expected window dressing ....after all, it's not what Labour believed before the election ....
Posted by: Brian Hill on 3:51pm Wed 22 Aug 07
I can see Wendy begin her fight against Alex in a professional, no nonsense manner. But as the rounds progress and she finds she is making little or no headway her frustrations could well boil over into vitriolic abuse of Salmond in particular and the SNP in genera,l all of which will be music to Salmond's ears.
It's not just a few policy points Wendy needs to tackle, its the mindset within the party hierarchy. A mindset which has produced an attitude which is perceived as complacent, arrogant and uncaring.
Certainly the Labour Party in Scotland has been completely devoid of any 'big' ideas in Scotland for decades whereas the SNP has ideas flowing from every pore.
Finally, for Wendy or anybody to succeed they will require a far more talented team of politicians available to them than currently exists in Scotland outside the Westminster heavies.
I can see Wendy begin her fight against Alex in a professional, no nonsense manner. But as the rounds progress and she finds she is making little or no headway her frustrations could well boil over into vitriolic abuse of Salmond in particular and the SNP in genera,l all of which will be music to Salmond's ears.
It's not just a few policy points Wendy needs to tackle, its the mindset within the party hierarchy. A mindset which has produced an attitude which is perceived as complacent, arrogant and uncaring.
Certainly the Labour Party in Scotland has been completely devoid of any 'big' ideas in Scotland for decades whereas the SNP has ideas flowing from every pore.
Finally, for Wendy or anybody to succeed they will require a far more talented team of politicians available to them than currently exists in Scotland outside the Westminster heavies.
Posted by: Kinghob on 8:36pm Wed 22 Aug 07
[quote]Finally, for Wendy or anybody to succeed they will require a far more talented team of politicians available to them than currently exists in Scotland outside the Westminster heavies.[/quote]
And their broad interest and instinct for the Westminster gravy train doesn't really translate automatically as talent when it comes to promoting the interests of Scotland, which renders them as rank amateurs even in comparison to the lightweight Labour MSP's and their practically "so light they're airborne" Liberal peers who support the union but hope to pretend they dinnae.
Finally, for Wendy or anybody to succeed they will require a far more talented team of politicians available to them than currently exists in Scotland outside the Westminster heavies.
And their broad interest and instinct for the Westminster gravy train doesn't really translate automatically as talent when it comes to promoting the interests of Scotland, which renders them as rank amateurs even in comparison to the lightweight Labour MSP's and their practically "so light they're airborne" Liberal peers who support the union but hope to pretend they dinnae.
Posted by: Los Angeles, Edinburgh on 8:53pm Wed 22 Aug 07
Kinhob says[quote]And their broad interest and instinct for the Westminster gravy train doesn't really translate automatically as talent when it comes to promoting the interests of Scotland,[/quote] Good comment. Their allegience is to another master.
How do they expect to put Scotland's interest's first when that ideal will, inevitably, clash with Westminster's claim on preferential treatment? Resign?
Kinhob says
And their broad interest and instinct for the Westminster gravy train doesn't really translate automatically as talent when it comes to promoting the interests of Scotland,
Good comment. Their allegience is to another master.
How do they expect to put Scotland's interest's first when that ideal will, inevitably, clash with Westminster's claim on preferential treatment? Resign?
Posted by: Tam o' Shanter, Shanter on 6:27pm Thu 23 Aug 07
The article states "[bold]He is Ms Alexander's intellectual equal[/bold] but can reach out to speak to the layman and woman in a way that, thus far, has eluded Ms Alexander."
Good grief, has Alex Salmond had some kind of severe head injury of late?
The article states "
He is Ms Alexander's intellectual equal but can reach out to speak to the layman and woman in a way that, thus far, has eluded Ms Alexander."
Good grief, has Alex Salmond had some kind of severe head injury of late?