Last month The Herald highlighted concern about the way Scotland's interests are being neglected by Whitehall mandarins charged with influencing the formulation and implementation of policy in Europe. There could be no better illustration than the way officials at the Department for Transport have handled the chaos surrounding the enforced tendering process for lifeline ferry services to Scotland's island communities.
It has been assumed by some that the desire of Scottish ministers to present these services as a special case, exempt from tendering, was being frustrated by Scottish Office and subsequently Scottish Executive civil servants whose real agenda was the privatisation and break-up of the state-owned provider Caledonian MacBrayne. To toe the European line, CalMac has been forced to spend an estimated £20m restructuring and tendering for 25 ferry routes, only to end up the sole bidders. In the case of the Gourock-Dunoon route currently operated by CalMac, there have been no tenders at all. Apart from the cost to the public purse, this saga has given Scotland's island communities more than six years of worry and uncertainty. Shambles? Fiasco? Neither is too strong a term.
Serving Scotland's fragile scattered islands on the storm-lashed north-west fringe of Europe was never going to generate big profits. The template that governs little ferries that potter around the Mediterranean simply does not fit. It takes sturdy vessels built to last for 30 years and lots of skill and experience to weather the perils of the Minch and the Pentland Firth. Given a large public subsidy, CalMac can do the job because the operation of a large fleet covering multiple routes gives it the requisite flexibility. Trying to operate a model based on six-year competitive tendering cycles was probably always doomed to failure. Officials arguing this case would have had no shortage of examples from elsewhere in Europe, including the Altmark bus company serving the German town of Stendal, which successfully argued in the European Court of Justice that payments by governments to companies providing essential services should not be seen as state aid, provided they are clearly defined.
Instead of using the Altmark judgment to press Scotland's case, DfT officials appear to have assumed the role of European Union policemen. This makes a mockery of the UK government's professed concern for its island communities. As with successive European fisheries deals and the placing of a vital order for a fisheries protection vessel with a Polish company rather a struggling Clyde shipyard, Scottish interests have been ignored. The way that the clear wishes of ministers are being undermined by civil servants is at odds with democratic accountability and reinforces the case for Scotland's political leaders making their own case in Brussels. It is absurd to suggest that EC commissioners would pull the plug on vital ferry routes serving vulnerable communities. Scottish ministers should have the courage of their own convictions and insist on the need to participate in making the policies that will have a vital impact on the future of their country.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article