Residents of the Western Isles made more official complaints about public services per head of population than anywhere else in Scotland last year.
The Scottish Public Services Ombudsman revealed there were nearly twice the level of complaints per capita in the Outer Hebrides than the Scottish average. By contrast, people living in and around Aberdeen were least likely to complain.
In a measure of complaints using Scottish postcodes, the Western Isles produced six complaints per 10,000 people while Aberdeen produced 2.4 compared to a Scotland-wide total of 3.4. Edinburgh also weighed in above average, with 4.1 complaints per 10,000.
But despite a huge upsurge in the level of inquiries and complaints received by the ombudsman, most were found to be spurious, with only 2% of complaints fully upheld last year.
A further 6% were partly upheld, but the vast majority failed - in many cases, because complainants had not first exhausted the complaints procedure with the public body they were complaining about.
Out of those cases which went on to be fully investigated and reported to parliament, the proportion fully upheld was 13% and a further 33% were upheld in part.
The figures were disclosed in the annual report of Professor Alice Brown, the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman, who investigates complaints about local government, health, housing the Scottish Government, quangos, and higher and further education.
Her staff handled more than 4200 inquiries and complaints last year, a 21% rise in inquiries but only a 7% rise in complaints.
Of the 1826 complaints which were closed during the year - some of which had been lodged the previous year - 41% were classed as "premature", 20% were deemed out of jurisdiction, 12% were discontinued before they could be investigated, 9% were either withdrawn or failed to provide enough information, 9% were not upheld, 6% were partially upheld, 2% were fully upheld and 1% were discontinued while they were being investigated.
Out of that total, some 315 complaints, or 17%, resulted in investigation reports being sent to parliament.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article