logo
   Web Issue 3272 October 7 2008   
spacer




Crude oil price eases as Iranians respond to offer
MARK SMITH, Deputy Business EditorJuly 05 2008

The price of black gold fell from near-record highs yesterday as geopolitical tensions eased after Iran said it had given a "constructive" response to the incentives package offered by six world powers aimed at resolving a stand-off over Tehran's disputed nuclear ambitions.

However, analysts remained bullish and said they expected the $150-a-barrel level to be tested before long.

Light, sweet crude settled $1.19 down at $144.10 a barrel, with volumes lower than usual because markets were closed in the US for the July 4 independence holiday.

Many analysts are anticipating what they call a "bull channel", effective around $147 a barrel, which they say could lead to $170 by late September and $200 by mid-January 2009.

Crude futures, which have risen more than 50% so far this year, reached a record high of $145.85 in New York on Thursday.

In London, Brent crude futures fell $1.17 to $144.91 a barrel yesterday - higher than its US equivalent for a third day on expectations that seasonal maintenance this month will curb output from North Sea fields.

Gains by the dollar on Thursday helped keep oil prices from rising further.

The dollar yesterday initially gained on most currencies, but later lost ground, falling to $1.5679 against the euro.

A weak dollar has boosted oil prices as investors often buy commodities as a hedge against inflation. A weak dollar also makes oil less expensive to investors overseas.

Meanwhile, sabre-rattling in the Middle East is one reason for oil's surge this week. Traders have been concerned that conflict with Iran could disrupt tight global supplies.

The offer of incentives proposed by the US, China, Russia, Germany, the UK and France was presented last month to try to persuade Iran to halt work they fear is aimed at making weapons.


© All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Posted by: bob mckay, glasgow on  Sat 5 Jul 08
Day by day its clearer; its ALWAYS been about the oil. It lubricates every political and financial transaction. Its the common denominator in costs and power planetwide.
Our prime minister asks for a £100Billion oil alternative energy resource. Think about that for a minute. Every conspiracy theorist that spoke of threats to civilisation , war, the climate.....im now convinced. We live in an era of energy crisis. Read your science fiction stories in these scenarios, none are good!
Unless alternative energy souces are discovered.....paddd
le, sheeit creek,up, without....rearrange into a coherent sentence. What do i tell my kids? Well WE had a good time for 50 years.......time now to vote independance and grab a bigger share as we have some oil? Seems another selfish act.
Posted by: wolf Klita, clydebank on 6:59am Sat 5 Jul 08
No, it is not a selfish act. Let us become independant, take control of our own oil and use the cash to push through alternative means of transport, heating and electricity.
Posted by: Donald Anderson, glasgow on 7:47am Sat 5 Jul 08
No need to invade Scotland. We gave oor ile away.
Posted by: Gordon Girvan, Los Angeles on 10:42pm Sat 5 Jul 08
INDEPENDENCE is the only answer for SCOTLAND and let's stop subsidising the english who could not organise a party in a brewery. Look at the PM that should give you a hint!!!!!!!!
Posted by: west ender, Glasgow on 3:27pm Mon 7 Jul 08
Gordon Girvan wrote:
INDEPENDENCE is the only answer for SCOTLAND and let's stop subsidising the english who could not organise a party in a brewery. Look at the PM that should give you a hint!!!!!!!!
Gordon,
Like Sean Connery your position on "independence" would carry more weight if you actually lived here. Your "Los Angeles" designation casts doubt on that!

I, personally am AGAINST independence. I am ALL for "devolution". Which I beleive, IF properly managed will benefit the average Scot much more in the long run than independence.

Devolution, if, as I stated previously, is properly managed, should give Scots the "best of both worlds" and perhaps even "the balance of power" in Westminster.
Posted by: west ender, Glasgow on 3:31pm Mon 7 Jul 08
Gordon Girvan wrote:
INDEPENDENCE is the only answer for SCOTLAND and let's stop subsidising the english who could not organise a party in a brewery. Look at the PM that should give you a hint!!!!!!!!
Gordon,

The "PM" in case you don't know, is a SCOT!
Add your comment
Please note: to publish your comment you must be registered on this site. If you are already registered, please enter your details below.
Email:
Password:




spacer
 IN YOUR AREA
 
Herald Appointments - Every Friday
Travel Shop
Airport Parking
Travel Insurance
Copyright © 2008 Newsquest (Herald & Times) Limited. All Rights Reserved   
Sitemap :: Circulation :: Syndication :: Advertising :: About Us :: Terms of Use