Anglo American, the world's second-biggest mining company, yesterday reported a 21% increase in second-half profit on record platinum prices and higher production of copper and iron ore.
Anglo, which is based in South Africa and listed on the London Stock Exchange, said its operating profit from core operations rose by 12% to $8.9bn (£4.6bn) during 2007.
Anglo American also said it had postponed the sale of UK building materials arm Tarmac because of poor credit market conditons.
Anglo put the company up for sale last August as part of a restructuring to focus on its main mining operations.
The coal-to-metals group said Tarmac had enjoyed a "very strong" 2007 and the sale marketing process would not be launched "until current credit market conditions improve".
Operating profits at Tarmac climbed by 38% to $474m (£243m), it said.
Anglo bought Tarmac in 1999 for £1.2bn. The firm was established in 1903 and has operations throughout the UK, particularly in the Midlands, with a major office in Wolverhampton.
Anglo said strong metals demand helped boost the group's overall performance last year.
Its mining operations for platinum contributed $2.7bn (£1.4bn) of the group's operating profits. Platinum prices have soard to record levels in recent days.
In a statement accompanying the results, chief executive Cynthia Carroll made no reference to the bid talk that has been dominating the sector recently. Earlier this month, BHP Billiton made a hostile takeover for rival Rio Tinto.
Commenting on Anglo's results, Richard Hunter, head of UK equities at Hargreaves Lansdown, said: "Today's strong numbers are re-affirmation that the long-term demand story is not going away any time soon. Its diversification between commodities leaves it well placed to enjoy differently spiking prices as they occur."
Shares in Anglo American closed 14p higher at £31.61 in London dealing.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article