The joint head of Shell's North Sea operations has called on the government to reverse tax rises which, he suggested, could jeopardise the future of the province.
John Gallagher, vice-president, technical, for the oil giant's European exploration and production business, said increases in corporation tax on North Sea profits in 2002 and 2005 had exacerbated the serious challenges faced by oil and gas firms.
While North Sea operators have been benefiting from record oil prices driven by buoyant demand, Gallagher said steep increases in the price of essential support services had wiped out much of the benefit.
Much of the industry's effort in the mature province is now focused on relatively small developments, making it increasingly hard for firms to make the kind of returns they need to justify investing in the region.
Asked by The Herald whether the government should cut North Sea taxes, Gallagher said: "A straightforward yes. The yes is not from oh, here's a Shell manager and he obviously wants to cut taxes', I give you my answer more as a Scottish practising engineer. The taxation on UK North Sea is inconsistent with basin maturity."
In an interview with The Herald, Gallagher made a plea for ministers and all involved with the North Sea to adopt a creative approach to ensure the potential of a key national resource was maximised.
"The last thing we should do is let that industry go, as we go through the maturing stages of the North Sea over the next 20 to 30 years," he said. "It's a wonderful opportunity to be extremely innovative, whether you're a regulator, a government official or whether you are a leader in industry."
After a critical report on the industry by the Health and Safety Executive and a fire on a rig operated by Lundin Petroleum last week highlighted fresh concerns about safety in the North Sea, Gallagher defended Shell's record. "Safety is a deeply held value in our organisation. We don't always get it right but there is tremendous commitment there."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article