Royal Bank of Scotland has said the timing of potentially lucrative share options for senior executives under a controversial new bonus plan is purely coincidental, after the awards were granted at an apparently low price.
Chief executive Sir Fred Goodwin and senior colleagues could benefit from the recent market slump, it has emerged - but through accident rather than design.
As The Herald reported yesterday, more than 22% of shareholders voted against the 2007 executive share option plan, which has been introduced to replace a scheme approved by shareholders in 1999. The scheme could see executives including Goodwin gain three times their basic salary - which in his case would amount to £3.6m.
Royal Bank announced to the stock market on Monday that it had granted options to 15 senior executives that will vest between 2010 and 2017 at an exercise price of 561p.
This appeared low by recent standards. Royal Bank shares closed up 1.5p at 577p on Monday, but were until recently trading well above 600p.
However, a spokesman for the bank said yesterday that the date on which the awards would be priced was predetermined in July by the remuneration committee - before recent stock market jitters took hold.
The awards would have been granted earlier, she added, but for the fact that the extended offer for ABN Amro had placed the bank effectively in a closed period.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article