BP cut the pay of Lord John Browne last year, piling more humiliation on its departing chief executive who was criticised by US officials as the company struggled with oil spills, safety lapses and allegations that it manipulated prices.
The huge energy company said in its annual report that Browne's total pay package - including £2m worth of shares under a long-term incentive scheme - was £4.57m for 2006, down 28% on the amount he received in 2005.
Browne - whose salary, bonus and non-cash payments amounted to £2.5m in 2006, against £3.3m in 2005 - is to step down on July 31.
The annual report reveals that on his departure date Browne will gain a year's salary in the form of a lump sum of £1.57m. He will also receive a testimonial payment worth another year's wages, and bonus worth £2m. There is also an extra £90,000 in "fringe benefits" that include a car and driver, the report said.
After 40 years with the oil company, Browne, 58, will also enjoy a lucrative pension worth more than £1m a year. This includes share options that could net up to £3m based on previous awards and share performance.
Despite record results at BP last year, Browne's bonus was cut by nearly half to £900,000 from £1.75m the previous year.
The value of the shares awarded to Browne under long-term share incentive schemes also fell, to £2m from £3.1m for 2005. Under the 2006-2008 share scheme, BP's chief could also be awarded up to another 1,761,249 shares, the report said. This was down from the 2,006,767 maximum number of shares which he was entitled to under the plan reported in last year's annual review.
This is the second consecutive year that Browne's salary and bonus has been reduced, following problems in 2005, including an explosion at BP's Texas City refinery which killed 15 workers. In 2006, US regulators partly blamed that accident on cost-cutting, casting a shadow over BP's and Browne's reputations.
US officials also started an investigation of BP last year for alleged manipulation of the propane market, and the company suffered a series of problems at its Alaskan operations following pipeline leaks.
These problems, and some delays on the start-up of key projects, overshadowed BP's strong results in 2006 and eroded the "management premium" that BP's shares had previously enjoyed over rivals such as Royal Dutch Shell.
BP said in January Browne would step down in July, 17 months earlier than planned, to be replaced by exploration and production chief Tony Hayward.
The early departure was intended to avoid a period of drift during a long handover period, and the announcement followed a disagreement last year between Browne and chairman Peter Sutherland over whether the chief executive should retire at 60, in line with established BP practice.
Hayward saw his bonus fall from £460,000 to £250,000 last year, although his salary did jump from £485,000 to £750,000 when he was appointed as the new chief executive.
Overall bonus payouts to BP's board of directors fell from £3.6m to £2.1m in 2006.
A company spokesman said bonus payments hinged on a number of factors including operational and safety performance, as well as the share price.
BP's safety record was centre stage again yesterday when the Reuters news agency put out a report based on an interview with a senior US official.
The official said BP's failure to maintain pipelines properly at its Prudhoe Bay field was a major factor behind Alaska's worst-ever onshore crude spill last year. Investigators are awaiting the final results of laboratory analysis on the corroded pipeline.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article