NFU Scotland, together with the National Sheep Association's Scottish region and the Scottish Beef Cattle Association, have written to the Scottish Government calling for compulsory testing of susceptible animals arriving in Scotland from the bluetongue (BT) zones in England.
Whilst a post-movement test is a requirement for any animals imported into Scotland from BT zones in continental Europe, no such requirement exists for animals coming from bluetongue zones within the UK.
With the vector-free period having opened on December 20, 2007, movements of animals from the English BT zone to disease-free areas such as Scotland can now occur, subject to certain requirements.
One of the requirements is a pre-movement test, the quickest of which can be done 14 days after the start of the vector-free period. With a turnaround at laboratories of around four days, it means in practice that such imports could have started coming into Scotland this week, hence the urgency of the call for more testing.
NFUS vice-president Nigel Miller said: "We have seen three instances in recent weeks - in Middlesbrough, Worcester and Kirkcudbright - where imported cattle have only been found to have bluetongue because of a post-movement test. At least cattle imported from Europe require a post-movement test. At the moment, the same rules are not being applied to animals coming out of the English zone, and in my view that presents too high a risk.
"Our advice to farmers remains clear - do not source cattle from BT zones. However, if there are those who wish to ignore that advice, we need a stronger safety net to prevent them exposing the whole industry to this threat.
"It is important to remember that vector free' does not mean there is no risk of disease getting into our midge population; it is just a lower risk at this time of year.
"A post-movement test, whilst still not providing the protection of a movement ban, could provide a crucial additional safeguard."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article