A review by a senior lawyer into the procurement of the delayed Ferguson Marine ferries found no evidence of fraud, though parts of the process were "not entirely satisfactory".
It comes after a BBC Disclosure documentary last year alleged the process for awarding the contract may have been rigged in favour of the Port Glasgow shipyard.
The documentary claimed Ferguson Marine had been given sight of a document detailing the design specifications by a consultant, some of which was copied into the yard's bid, while competitors had to submit a bid with the aid of a less detailed dossier.
Following the documentary, the ferry infrastructure agency CMAL (Caledonian Maritime Assets Ltd) instructed Barry Smith KC to investigate the award of the contract.
His report was published in full on Wednesday; much of it focussed on the period in 2014 and 2015 before the contact was awarded.
Read More: Minister under fire for CalMac spin over 'record' ferry passenger numbers
His conclusions said: "Ultimately, the question posed was whether a fraud was committed during the procurement process. I did not find evidence of fraud.
"That is not the same as saying that the procurement process was conducted perfectly."
Mr Smith's investigation did not specifically look into whether procurement rules had been breached, instead it considered whether fraud had taken place.
In his report, he said he had met with the journalist behind the programme in July this year.
He received an email from the journalist stating: "We are concerned that your remit has been drawn so narrowly that it will exclude examination of the important allegations the BBC made."
Mr Smith's report said he doubted whether Ferguson Marine Engineering Ltd (FMEL)'s possession of a document called the statement of technical requirements (SOTR) gave it an advantage.
He said: "It is superficially attractive to conclude that FMEL gained an advantage in the procurement process by having possession of the SOTR but closer analysis of the process seems to me to cast doubt on that conclusion."
Mr Smith said it was a "poor quality document" and noted "somewhat bizarrely, when assessed by CalMac against the SOTR, the FMEL bid ranked second".
He said he could not draw any conclusions around the allegation that FMEL was allowed to effectively submit a new bid, saying "this aspect of the procurement process is not entirely satisfactory".
However, he found "no evidence of any fraudulent intent on the part of any CMAL employee".
Kevin Hobbs, chief executive of CMAL, said: "We welcome the findings of Barry Smith KC's independent investigation, which has established no evidence of fraud in the procurement of vessels 801 and 802.
"We do, however, recognise that the report identifies a number of missteps over the course of the procurement during 2014 and 2015, and mitigations have been in place for several years to ensure these do not happen again.
Read More: Tycoon Jim McColl accepts his shipyard firm was not blameless in ferry fiasco
"For example, all parties involved in a CMAL competitive tender are required to sign a confidentiality agreement, and all clarification meetings with bidders are now carried out using the same method of communication."
He added: "The KC's report recognises the CMAL team at the time of this procurement as diligent, dedicated, hardworking individuals - which we stand by entirely.
"This is also true of the current team, who are firmly focussed on the delivery of these vessels, working closely with Fergusons to ensure they enter service as soon as possible."
The Glen Sannox and the newly-named Glen Rosa are due to be delivered five years later than planned and costing more than three times the initial £97 million price tag.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel