In this column Citizens Advice Scotland spokespeople often outline the exhausting demand our network is under.
Amid the fall-out of the pandemic and still in the midst of a cost of living crisis, people need advice more than ever. More people are seeking advice, and they are often needing help with increasingly complex cases and turning up in a state of crisis.
Bluntly, CABs need more funding. That funding needs to be secure, flexible and long-term.
So imagine my dismay when the Home Office launched a consultation proposing to charge Citizens Advice registration fees to provide immigration advice.
The proposal would apply to bodies from the non-fee-charging sector who currently provide immigration advice; Citizens Advice have had a block exemption on this for years.
Instead, these new proposals would see individual advisors charged a registration fee as well as the organisations they provide advice for.
Looking at the broad figures the consultation suggests, this would lead to the Citizens Advice network in Scotland facing set-up costs of around £300,000 to register our advisors and CABs, and ongoing costs in the region of £223,000 per year.
That would have absolutely disastrous consequences for a service already struggling to keep pace with demand.
It would also have a chilling effect on our ability to recruit and retain volunteer advisors, and potentially restrict people’s access to advice. Volunteers Scotland say that the percentage of adults in Scotland volunteering for an organisation or community group has dropped from 26% in 2019 to 22% in 2022, and CABs have faced challenges with volunteer recruitment and retention since the pandemic.
It is vitally important that people understand that the inadvertent impact of these fees wouldn’t be restricting people’s access to immigration advice in a CAB, it would be about restricting access to advice in a CAB entirely.
People rarely seek advice on just one issue: life isn’t that black and white. That’s why the CAB service is a generalist wraparound one, so when someone comes in with a problem in one area, an advisor can help them through all their issues rather than signposting them elsewhere.
A scenario where we face huge charges to register our advisors to give immigration advice risks our ability to deliver that wraparound service. Last year 12,743 pieces of immigration-related advice were given to 4,406 people by CABs in Scotland. These clients didn’t just get immigration advice; they got help with issues like housing, employment and energy as well. By restricting our ability to help these clients with immigration issues, it restricts our ability to help with everything.
And if you restrict our ability to help people with everything, they will fall through the cracks. Even if you don’t subscribe to our view that everyone deserves access to free advice to understand their rights regardless of their circumstances or background, you have to acknowledge the risk people not knowing their rights creates, and the potential costs it pushes onto the state in other ways.
Ultimately funding advice is a form of preventative spending. Good advice can reduce strain on the NHS, on our legal system and on our social services. Making it more difficult for us to deliver that advice to some of the most vulnerable communities in our country is a fool’s errand.
This consultation runs until June 5. We have made our concerns about these proposals clear and we would urge the Home Office not to proceed with a decision that could have disastrous consequences for advice provision in Scotland and across the UK.
Derek Mitchell is Chief Executive of Citizens Advice Scotland
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here